Find out about our consultations held from 2016 to 2022, the feedback we received from the public, and input from relevant stakeholders.

Consultation—Draft amendment to Marine Order 11—living and working conditions on vessels

This marine order and proposed amendments apply to regulated Australian vessels and foreign vessels.

Key changes 

  1. Implementing the 2018 MLC amendments to ensure:
    • Seafarers’ employment agreements continue to have effect while a seafarer is captive due to acts of piracy or armed robbery against ships.
    • Wages and other entitlements continue for the period of captivity.
    • Entitlement to repatriation does not lapse due to captivity. 
  2. Definitions of armed robbery against ships and acts of piracy are included in section 4.
  3. Inclusion of subsections 27(7) and (8) to ensure compliance with the seafarer wage requirements, even if the seafarer is in captivity due to piracy or armed robbery including—if the work agreement has expired.
  4. Inclusion of paragraph 31(1)(g) and amendment to subsection 34(2) to ensure compliance with the seafarer repatriation requirements, even if the seafarer was in captivity due to piracy or armed robbery.
  5. Inclusion of paragraph 15 and amendment to paragraph 16 of schedule 3 to ensure the work agreement includes the seafarer’s entitlements if the seafarer is in captivity due to piracy or armed robbery.

Why we are making amendments

On 5 June 2018, the International Labour Organization approved amendments to the MLC, 2006 relating to the protection of seafarers’ wages and entitlements while they are held captive on or off the ship as a result of acts of piracy or armed robbery against ships. 

We are now proposing to implement these amendments through Marine Order 11. 

Submissions closed at 11.59pm AEST Sunday 14 March 2021.

*Please note – this consultation is not intended to be a full review of Marine Order 11. 

Background

The intent of the marine order is to give effect to the MLC, setting out the requirements for: 

  • seafarers working on vessels 
  • conditions of employment
  • accommodation, food and catering; health protection, medical care, welfare and social security protection
  • noise levels on board vessels, and additional requirements for living
  • working conditions on regulated Australian vessels.

Next steps

Following consultation, we anticipate Marine Order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels) Amendment Order 2021 to come into effect on 1 June 2021.

We will provide guidance material on our website to assist vessel operators, shipping cargo industry bodies, training organizations, seafarer representative organizations and government agencies in understanding amendments to Marine order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels), made under the Navigation Act 2012.

Resources

Consultation: alternatives to carrying a float-free EPIRB, for vessels less than 7.5 metres 2019

consultation

Have your say on the National Standard for Commercial Vessels (NSCV) Part C7B—Design and Construction—Equipment—Communications Equipment). This relates to the carriage of float-free EPIRBs on domestic commercial vessels.

This consultation applies to domestic commercial vessel owners and operators of vessels less than 7.5 metres long, operating in B waters (offshore operations) or C waters (restricted offshore operations), where the vessel does not have level flotation.

From 1 January 2021, more domestic commercial vessels will be required to carry a float-free emergency position indicating radio beacon (EPIRB). 

For vessels less than 7.5 metres long without level flotation operating in B waters or C waters, we understand it may not be practical or feasible to carry a float-free EPIRB on these kind of vessels and have proposed several alternative options. 

The options we propose include:

  • Option 1: carry a float-free EPIRB (no alternative)
  • Option 2: wear a personal locator beacon (PLB), in addition to carrying a manually activating EPIRB 
  • Option 3: carry a manually activating EPIRB and wear a lifejacket
  • Option 4: carry a manually activating EPIRB in a buoyant storage device

AMSA is also seeking feedback on any additional alternative options, which stakeholders consider will achieve an equivalent or acceptable level of safety.

AMSA will publish the details of the approved alternative options for smaller vessels, as well as the feedback received. AMSA anticipates this will occur in March 2019. The requirement for specified vessels to carry a float-free EPIRB does not become mandatory until 1 January 2021, however the standards allow for operators of vessels affected by the changes to commence transitioning from 1 January 2019.

Consultation papers

Read the consultation paper PDF225.98 KB—alternative options for vessels less than 7.5 metres long.

Read the float-free EPIRB consultation feedback report PDF400.19 KB.

Consultation on the draft 2019-20 Cost Recovery Implementation Statement

Your feedback is requested to help AMSA understand your views on current cost recovery arrangements. This will also inform future consultative activities for cost recovery, used for the upcoming national system for domestic commercial vessel safety review in 2020–21.

Make an online submission.

Call: 1800 627 484 (within Australia) or +61 2 6279 5000 (outside Australia)

Please provide your feedback and comments by Sunday, 10 November 2019.

Who are we seeking feedback from

Feedback is requested from advisory committees, industry bodies, associations and others who have an interest in our cost recovery arrangements.

What we are consulting about

The draft Cost Recovery Implementation Statement (CRIS) provides information on the application of cost recovery activities, including financial and non-financial performance measures. It contains financial results for 2018–19, and budget forecasts for 2019–20 and the three following years.

We recover costs through cost-recovered levies and fees for the:

  • provision of maritime navigational infrastructure and regulation to support safe ship navigation in Australian waters—excluding within port boundaries
  • environmental marine protection, prevention, and combativeness
  • seafarer and ship safety—primarily under Navigation Act 2012
  • ship registration
  • marine services under Navigation Act 2012
  • domestic commercial vessel safety marine services.

This CRIS does not cover domestic commercial vessel safety regulatory activities, which are currently funded by a combination of Commonwealth government funding and contributions from state government jurisdictions. As a result and given the upcoming review of service delivery, operating costs, and funding options of the national system, it is not possible to comment on or accurately predict the level of cost recovery for this regulatory activity.

Please provide your feedback and comments on the draft 2019-20 CRIS, as well as existing cost recovery arrangements. Any feedback will be included in the final CRIS and is expected to be published on our website in December 2019.

For more information, read the draft cost recovery implementation statement (CRIS) PDF1.12 MB.

Consultation feedback on the national system transition 2016

The 2016 consultation paper—Cost recovery for services under the National System for Domestic Commercial Vessel Safety invited comment on two proposed models for a full cost recovery levy, and fees for service—to offset the costs associated with AMSA delivering national system services from 1 July 2017.

Consultation was open between August and October 2016 and received over 600 individual responses.

Initial response from Australian governments—2016

Following the industry consultation, in late 2016 Australia’s Transport Ministers extended the start date of national service delivery by AMSA to 1 July 2018, to allow more time to address the issues raised by industry.

In early 2017 AMSA undertook further economic analysis to build a more detailed picture of the domestic commercial vessel industry to inform future cost recovery arrangements.

Summary of feedback

The 2016 consultation focused on two options for full cost recovery levy models. The response from industry was that full cost recovery would negatively impact owners and operators across the domestic vessel industries. They were not receptive to either of the proposed levy models although they remained strongly supportive of a national approach to safety.

Concerns were around seven key themes:

  • cost increases and impact on industry
  • government subsidisation versus full cost recovery
  • privatisation of survey services
  • service delivery arrangements
  • safety implications
  • industry sustainability and wellbeing.

Government response—2017

Australia’s Transport Ministers have now considered the views of industry, informed by additional analysis and modelling, and agreed to provide funding to support operators and crew in transitioning to new service arrangements. The additional funding will give industry time to adjust to a gradual increase in costs.

At the same time AMSA has been preparing to deliver services from 1 July 2018.

Following is an overview of the main themes from the consultation and how issues raised have been addressed:

Implementation

What was proposed in 2016

Transition to national system services under AMSA was proposed for 1 July 2017.

What you told us

Respondents were concerned about the impact on owners, operators and crew of a full cost recovery model implemented within a short time frame.
Request for a delay in implementation to allow time for industry to prepare.

Government response

In late 2016 Australian governments agreed to extend full transition to the national system until 1 July 2018.

Show all / Hide all[/collapse]

[collapsed]

Cost recovery

What was proposed in 2016

Full cost recovery from first year with no government subsidy.

What you told us

Respondents told us the proposed levy represented an unexpected, significant and immediate increase in costs to industry.

Government response

Australian governments have agreed to provide over $100 million to support industry in transition to national services.

No levy will be charged to industry in the first year of AMSA’s service delivery. Fees for service will be charged from 1 July 2018.

Transition period

What was proposed in 2016

A two-year transition period was proposed.

What you told us

Respondents were concerned the two-year timeframe was not sufficient.

Feedback indicated five years was an appropriate timeframe for transition.

Government response

Australian governments have extended the transition period with levy charges gradually increasing.

Levy model and structure

What was proposed in 2016

Two levy models options were proposed on the basis of full cost recovery.

Model 1—proportional

Flat charge per metre. Levy rate based on the measured length of the vessel with the rate applied per metre.

Model 2—progressive

Fixed charge, plus incremental rate per metre. Levy rate based on the vessel class and measured length, combining a fixed charge per vessel with an incremental metre rate.

What you told us

The majority of respondents rejected both models arguing that factors—including risk, area of operation, type of operation, meterage, passenger numbers, ability to pay, fleet size, frequency of use, seasonal operations, calm water use, compliance record and time taken up with the regulator—should be taken into account in determining the levy paid by each operator.

Government response

AMSA has developed one levy model—subject to final Australian Government approval—taking into account industry concerns.

The revised model proposed will see the levy calculated on the basis of vessel class, vessel length and area of operation.
The commercial vessel industry is diverse with some sectors facing higher risks than others. To build and administer a model which incorporated each factor would be difficult for industry to navigate and likely to increase administrative costs.

Fees

What was proposed in 2016

A proposed fee structure was presented outlining a range of fees for services. Fees would be charged for services provided, as per Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines.

What you told us

Feedback on the proposed fee structure did not feature heavily in the consultation.

Government response

Currently state and territory governments charge different fees and provide different levels of subsidies.

From July 2018, fees will be the same across Australia.

AMSA will retain the fee structure previously proposed with some minor amendments to reflect refinements in processes and to align with the consumer price index.

Charging arrangements

What was proposed in 2016

The proposed levy would be charged to the holder of the following vessel permissions:

  • Certificate of Survey
  • Non-survey approval (EX02)
  • Restricted C approval (EX40), or
  • Other exemptions which allow the vessel to operate.

What you told us

Respondents requested a greater range of exemptions be considered.

Government response

AMSA is considering the list of vessels which may be exempt from the levy and any regulatory changes will be consulted on further.

Service provision

What was proposed in 2016

The consultation paper described services being delivered nationally through a truly national model with services made available through a range of channels—online services, phone support and face to face support provided through selected AMSA locations and Australia Post offices around Australia.

What you told us

Respondents questioned what they would receive for their money, especially in remote areas—given the proposed cost increases.

Government response

AMSA has progressed its service offer and a full outline of these services is set out in the customer service offer information sheet.

To achieve the benefits of a national system—a centralised model will be adopted for the management of administrative and regulatory functions, development of standards, safety education and support, compliance and incident reporting.

This model ensures all people who participate in the national system receive the same level of service, can seek support and obtain consistent advice. Services will be delivered through multiple channels, including regional offices so the regulated community can contact, interact and transact with AMSA—wherever they are located and at a time that suits them.

Privatisation of services

What was proposed in 2016

It was described in the consultation paper that vessel owners would be required to engage a private accredited marine surveyor to undertake a range of survey functions.

What you told us

Respondents indicated the privatisation of surveyors and full cost recovery would add significantly to survey costs. There were also concerns over quality control and how increases in demand for services would be managed by AMSA.

Government response

Most state and territory marine safety agencies have already ceased, or are phasing out, the provision of government survey services.

From 1 July 2018, all surveys will be conducted by AMSA accredited private surveyors. This will give vessel owners the choice of who they engage and introduces a competitive market mechanism.

As at 1 November 2017, AMSA had accredited 257 surveyors and 8 recognised organisations to perform survey services.

The integrity of surveyor services is assured by the accreditation system developed and managed by AMSA. It requires surveyors to:

  • have a deep understanding of national system legislation, standards and other relevant documents
  • obtain and maintain professional indemnity insurance
  • obtain and hold a membership of a professional association
  • operate under the ISO 9000 or equivalent management system
  • have appropriate experience, and
  • have appropriate qualifications.

AMSA provides updates and conduct educational workshops with surveyors each year.

The proposed streamlined survey arrangements will assist in reducing costs over time.

Safety

What was proposed in 2016

The national system includes a range of core services and activities aimed at promoting safety and delivering benefits for commercial boating, fishing and tourism operations across Australia.
It will encompass safety education and support to encourage people to actively promote safety by fulfilling their regulatory responsibilities and fostering safe practices in their industry.

What you told us

Respondents believed the limited capacity to absorb an increase in costs will have a negative impact on maintaining safety standards and/or modernising vessels.
They also indicated increased costs would affect safety throughout the industry as a result of cost cutting leading to smaller crews, less resources for training, carrying out operations in smaller vessels and pressure to reduce maintenance costs.

Government response

The decision of Transport Ministers to subsidise transition over an extended period of time has been taken to address industry’s concerns about their ability to absorb cost increases.
The national system under AMSA will deliver nationally consistent regulation of safety for the first time. This will be done in collaboration with owners, operators and crew, as well as third party service providers and industry stakeholders.
AMSA is negotiating with its state and territory partner agencies in relation to the delivery of compliance and inspection services to ensure the same presence for on water and alongside inspections is maintained.

Industry sustainability and wellbeing

What you told us

Respondents indicated increased costs would put additional pressure on sectors, particularly small operators in the fishing sector, and the increase may have an impact on their commercial viability and the health and wellbeing of some operators.

Government response

Australian governments have acknowledged feedback about increases in costs and the impact this may have on this industry.

In response, they have agreed to provide funding over an extended period to support industry as they adjust to new national system services.

While fees for services are standardised and AMSA assumes service delivery—no levy will be charged to industry in the first year.

This will ensure fair and equitable treatment of all operators around the country during the implementation period.

New fees for services will apply from 1 July 2018.
 

Changes to Marine Order 47 (Offshore Industry Units)

This consultation may be of interest to owners, operators and designers of offshore industry units, as well as recognised organisations. Offshore industry units include mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs), floating production, storage and offtake vessels (FPSOs), floating storage units (FSUs), floating liquefied natural gas facilities (FLNGs), floating central processing facilities (CPFs) and similar.

We are seeking your feedback on the following:

  • Does the draft marine order clarify obligations for the survey and certification of offshore industry units?
  • Does the marine order provide sufficient practicality in terms of complying with drydock alternatives such as in-water hull inspections?

It is intended that these amendments will be made to the current order with effect from 1 October 2019

Consultation papers