Australian Maritime Safety Authority

Refusal of a ships access and Condition of Entry to Australian ports


Australia is a signatory to various International Maritime Organization (IMO) and International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions which aim to ensure ships are safe.

Vessels that are not operated and managed to meet applicable standards and relevant Australian laws pose an increased risk to seafarers, vessels and the environment.   The Navigation Act 2012 provides additional powers so that in some circumstances, AMSA may direct that:

  • A vessel must not enter or use any port, or a specified port/s, in Australia or the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of Australia.
  • A vessel must comply with specified requirements while it:
    • is approaching, entering, or using any port, or a specified port or specified ports, in Australia or the EEZ of Australia; or
    • is in or is leaving any port, or a specified port or specified ports, in Australia or the EEZ of Australia.

AMSA’s power to give these directions is in section 246 of the Navigation Act 2012. This section does not specify a minimum or maximum duration for refusal of access or how long conditions need to be complied with. AMSA will make those decisions based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

In support of that decision making process AMSA intends to take the following general approach to the exercise of this power.

Directions that a vessel not enter or use port/s

AMSA may consider issuing a direction refusing access to Australian ports where a vessel has a poor port State control (PSC) record or there are concerns about the performance of the related vessel operator.

With PSC performance for individual vessels the general principles that will be applied in the making of a decision to issue a direction not to enter or use an Australian port, or ports, are as follows:

  • Refusal of access for 3 months – may be issued
  • where a vessel has been detained then released with conditions to carry out corrective action, but returns to Australia without the corrective action having been taken; or
  • where a vessel has incurred three detentions in a two year period and has not been previously issued a direction.
  • Refusal of access for 12 months – where a vessel has previously been issued a direction and is detained within two years of the expiry of the refusal period under that direction (while under the same operator).  The nature of previous detentions that resulted in the initial direction may also be taken into consideration.
  • Refusal of access for 24 months - where a vessel has previously been issued two directions and is detained within two years of the expiry of the refusal period under the second direction (while under the same operator). The nature of previous detentions that resulted in the initial direction may also be taken into consideration.

Note: When considering vessel performance AMSA will also look at the performance of the company as a whole. Where this is deemed unacceptable the periods detailed in these general principles may be extended.

Additionally, or in combination with the general principles above, a direction to refuse access may be issued where:

  • A significant breach of Australian legislation has occurred.
  • The effectiveness of the vessel operator’s management system is considered to pose a significant risk to the welfare of seafarers, their safety or Australia’s marine environment.
  • The standards of some vessels managed by an operator are so poor as to cast significant doubt on the standards of other vessels managed by the same company.  AMSA may consider directions in respect to other vessels of that operator.

A direction resulting from a new detention in Australia will generally have effect as soon as the vessel leaves the Australian port or anchorage following the clearance of the latest detainable deficiency.

AMSA may vary the direction to allow access to a specific port in the event of force majeure or overriding safety considerations.  Specific requirements may be imposed on the owner, operator or the Master of the ship to ensure safe entry in those circumstances.

The table below lists the vessels subject to directions, given by AMSA in the last 24 months, not to enter or use an Australian port.

Vessel name
(IMO number)
Flag Direction Issue Date Expire
Media release providing details of Direction issued:

Vega Auriga
(IMO 9347789)


Refused access for 3 months



Media release—27 August 2014

Territory Trader
(IMO 8812899)


Refused access for 3 months



Media release—25 November 2014

Meratus Sangatta
(IMO 9116797)


Refused access for 3 months



Media release—9 January 2015

Red Rover
(IMO 9481673)

Indonesia Refused access for 12 months 31/1/15 31/1/16 Media release—31 January 2015
Noah Satu (IMO 9313620) Indonesia Refused access for 3 months



Media release—21 September 2015

Noah Satu (IMO 9313620) Indonesia Refused access for 12 months



Media release—7 February 2016

Five Stars Fujian (IMO 9402287)

Hong Kong Refused access for 12 months 1/9/2016 1/9/2017 Media release—1 September 2016
Kiunga Chief (IMO 9195119) Papua New Guinea Refused access for 3 months 30/5/2017 30/8/2017 Media release—5 June 2017
Rena (IMO 9464780) Bahamas Refused access for 6 months 03/08/2017 03/02/2018 Media release—3 August 2017
DL Carnation (IMO 9618680) Panama Refused access for 12 months 14/09/2017 14/09/2018 Media release—14 September 2017

Directions that a vessel comply with requirements while approaching, entering or leaving port/s

A vessel’s current circumstances or non-compliance history may result in AMSA issuing a direction requiring compliance with specific requirements while the vessel is approaching, entering, using or leaving any port, or specified port/s in Australia or its EEZ. 

These requirements will be applied having given consideration to the nature and level of risk posed to the welfare and safety of seafarers, vessels and the marine environment. 

Such directions will be additional to port State control actions and may be applied where it is considered specific action is required by the Master and/or operator in order to address identified risks.

Examples of such situations include:

  • Non-compliance with the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) such as payment of wages, crew welfare or Seafarer Employment Agreements.
  • Poor management of fatigue and hours of work/rest.
  • Lack of compliance with mandatory reporting requirements such as ReefREP. 
  • Carriage of inadequate and out-of-date nautical charts and publications.
  • Exercise of unsound navigation practices including; passage planning, identification of hazards and lack of understanding of Designated Shipping Areas (within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park).
  • Inappropriate procedures and use of equipment required by MARPOL.

AMSA’s compliance and enforcement policy

AMSA will always take into consideration the specific circumstances that exist in relation to the vessel.

The principles AMSA applies to ensure that decision making is accountable, consistent, transparent, impartial, proportionate and fair are documented in AMSA’s Compliance Enforcement Policy.


Twitter Facebook YouTube Copyright · Accessibility · Site Map · Privacy

Information Publication Scheme Davis Langdon Certification Services